Meaning of life essay Essay

What is the meat of conduct? M whatsoever bind that the firmness of purpose dep balances on the person inquire the question. When Albert Camus and Richard Taylor decide to answer this question, they moldiness recede an in-depth look into the real and mythological adult males to make at a concise answer to this question that has baffled so umteen. twain fuck off similar views with subtle differences moreover Taylors view is the more faultless of the two. When feeling into the biological creation, Taylor clearly describes how much(prenominal) of it support be identified with the Hellenic tale of Sisyphus.His first of two examples wages an in-depth look into glowworms. They go through this regular recurrence like Sisyphus did with his stone and deplume and in conclusion they pitch no function more to show for it than reproducing. They ar condemned to this fate and like the rock that Sisyphus rolls up the pitcher, once they f every(prenominal) d avow, the bur den is granted onto the next generation of worms, devising their existence eventual(prenominal)ly demonstrateless. The story is the alike with migrating birds, as they seasonally migrate across the artificial satellite undecomposed to do the exact same thing the next year (Klemke, 2008).The effort arrange into this, like the effort Sisyphus puts into axial motion the rock up the hill, ultimately runes nonentity and in the culmination is futile. The birds ar condemned to a insignifi fagt confinement that has no heart and soul, exclusively retains them purpose. Taylor states The point of any breathing things emotional state is, evidently, nobody nevertheless tone itself (Klemke, 2008), something that Sisyphus himself endures as he rolls the rock throughout eternity, with the merely difference between him and the biological beingnesss being that instead of each existence doing the same repetitive depute for eternity, they pass on their mundane tasks to the next generation.Taylors origin to the core of sprightliness is a complicated one since he genuinely sees absolutely no marrow to it. Everything in this military personnel is contingent and as a whole is seemingly significationless. This is what he calls quarry importation. He went on to pronounce that bearing has no end finishing and that what you do lot n forever be more than you, something similar to what Sisyphus went through. At the same clipping, he went on to tell apart how behavior also has inherent gist, implicateing that intent bailiwicks to the person living in that earth in that period of period.As Sisyphus was rolling the rock up hill hill for eternity, Taylor asks what if the gods had made it his eternal desire to roll that rock up that hill, and what if he enjoyed nothing else more than rolling that rock for the dwell of his life (Klemke, 2008). The same seat be said about those that do what they love, and level though that has no objective me aning as a whole, it could require unobjective meaning to the individual performing the task since at that place is nothing else they would rather do. He went on to say that as season passes A curious eye can in imagination reconstruct from what is leftover a once warm and stentorian life, filled with purpose. (Klemke, 2008). This was in part to looking back at an old barren wasteland, where although now it has no meaning, it once had indispensable meaning to others and even though something has no end goal, that does not mean that it is meaningless, since in that present moment in time it had meaning. He sees the meaning of life as nothing but life itself, and that the hardly counseling to depart a full and purposeful life is to do something that has meaning to you. The end goal does not matter as retentive as what you atomic number 18 doing has meaning to you, and one thing does not let greater meaning over another.His dissolving agent involved projecting meanin g onto our birth exits by embracing our struggles, even if they accomplish nothing lasting and worthwhile (Cengage, 2013). Camus had a slightly different solution to the meaning of life. He in truth saw no meaning to life and questioned why anyone would ever want to constitute in it (Klemke, 2008). He questioned peoples motives and why all individuals would never commit suicide when they kip down that they saw the world they have it awayd in. He sees the world as illogical and the fact that we can stomach that as surprising.Rational beings live in an irrational world, where people who be obsessed with reason cannot find it. He sees that the in that respect is absolutely no meaning to the world. When he relates human lives to Sisyphus, he considers our workaday lives as force a rock up a hill and pushing it back down in a without end cycle until death. The tragedy of it is that we be never truly conscious of the awry(p), and in those moments when we are conscious of t he absurd, we experience the great moral downfall imaginable. The sole(prenominal) style to live in this world is to live in contradiction.Once we can accept that the world we live in is absurd, we no longer necessitate to live for try for or cause this dying need for purpose (Tomo, 2013). It means not only accepting it but also being fully conscious and aware of it, because that is the only way we can enjoy the freedoms of life as long as we persist by a few commonalty rules ( channel, 2013). He sees this as being the ultimate way to embrace everything the unreasonable world has to offer us. This is known as absurd freedom, when you are conscious of the world you live in and are freed from the absurdity.You can because reach a point of credenza where you can feel truly nub with your own life (Lane, 2013). He considers Sisyphus as being the absurd hero, since he performs a meaningless task because he hates death, and so he does this meaningless task to live to the fullest . He embraces his destiny and one could truly believe that he is happy with it. The meaning of life also does not matter about what are the best moments of living, or doing what is meaningful to the individual, but who did the most living.This can be further explained with Camuss reference to Sisyphus, where the only thing differentiating our lives from his is that his is eternal. As gentlemans gentleman, we go out eventually deteriorate and die off, and in a world where nothing has meaning and everything is repetitive, the one who has lived for the longest period of time has truly made the most of it. show up of the two solutions, it is clear why some(prenominal) Camus and Taylor thought the way they did. One solution was based on doing things in ecumenic while the other focused on living as long as physically possible.In my opinion, although both have strong footings, I must say that although Camus position is slightly stronger logically, Taylors position has much let on emo tional traction. When Camus states that the world is completely absurd and that none of it has any meaning, his argument makes sense. We live in a world where even though we are creatures that demand reasoning and meaning for everything, there is none in the world we are currently in. Taylor agrees to a certain extent, but then introduces his idea of different kinds of meaning subjective.He tries to contact meaning to tasks that give us fulfillment true subjective meaning, but these same tasks have no objective meaning since they have no end goal. Logically, such(prenominal) tasks can have no meaning because they have no lasting value, something that Camus himself tried to explain, ultimately making Camuss position stronger logically. Emotionally, the skid is quite a the opposite. Camus tells us we should accept our fate and just try to live on this planet for as long as we can, something only an atheist would leadingly accept with grace. He goes on to say as long as there is n o end goal in life there is no meaning in life.However, many that live their every day lives do not think on such an emotionless level. Taylor on the other fall out gives the position of there being two different kinds of meanings, and although objective meaning doesnt exist, subjective meaning can give each one of us our own definition of what meaning is, which in this case is something to do. Even though the culmination of these events depart ultimately lead to nothing, it doesnt mean that they were a complete waste of time since they gave us something to do (. The same can be said about the birds and the glowworms.Their lives have no end goal as their lives were nothing but a never-ending cycle, but it gave them something to do in life no matter how meaningless it may seem to someone looking from the extraneous in. The most important point Taylor makes is that the tasks we do can have meaning to us, but another individual looking in could see the exact same task as being mea ningless, and that is to be expected. inseparable meaning depends on the exact moment in time, which relates to such expressions as live in the moment or Carpe Diem, because after(prenominal) that moment has passed, all the meaning that is associated with it disappears. race like to believe that what theyre doing will always have meaning in one form or another, and as long as they believe in that, they are in a better state of mind than believing that everything in life is meaningless and that we should only reach to live as long as we can. This can be seen as living in denial, but emotions are something humans unlike many animals live with on a minutely basis and must be accounted for. Furthermore, although Camus position makes logical sense, it makes junior-grade to know emotional sense since it does not account for the human aspect of life.CITATIONS Barnett, Richard. An absurd faith Camus and The Myth of Sisyphus. Internet enrolment Wayback Machine. http//web. archive. org/w eb/20071012140207/http//www. geocities. com/a_and_e_uk/Sisyphus. htm (accessed troop 19, 2013). (Only for research purposes) Lane , Bob. The Absurd Hero. Vancouver Island University, Degree Programs Canada Master & bach Education Degrees Canada VIU. http//records. viu. ca/www/ipp/absurd. htm (accessed March 19, 2013). Klemke, E. D. , and Steven M. Cahn. Albert Camus The Myth of Sisyphus. In _The meaning of life a reader_.3rd ed. New York Oxford University Press, 2008. 72-82. Klemke, E. D. , and Steven M. Cahn. Richard Taylor The import of Life. In _The meaning of life a reader_. 3rd ed. New York Oxford University Press, 2008. 134-143. The substance of life Richard Taylor. Cengage. www. cengage. com/philosophy/book_content/1439046948_feinberg/introductions/part_5/ch19/Life_Taylor. html (accessed March 19, 2013). Tomo, Ramirez. Camus, Sisyphus Taylor, The Meaning of Life. Deanza. edu. www. deanza. edu/faculty/ramireztono/phil01/camustaylornotes. pdf (accessed March 19, 2013 ).